Category Archives: Education & Society

Random ideas on random conversations (CCK08-Week 9)

CCK08

I'm having a very hard time trying to get back on track with my CCK08 course. I've been reading as much as possible, but my participation rate fell down dramatically after the first weeks. Too many things going on at the same time.

Of course, this leaves the question of "How do I go back in?" Should I write posts for every week? Should I try and get hold of all the information possible as fast as I can? How can I say something (that is, write something) if I didn't participate in the last weeks? What should I do?!?!?!?!?

Then, I remembered what Stephen and George said at the beginning of the course: No one will be able to read all the information produced. On the other hand, given that this is about my learning (and the universe has a way to make things perfect), everything that got in my way in the last few weeks has something to do with all the issues discussed in CCK08. In fact, I've been kind of living some of those issues. For the last few months I've been a student at UFRJ (Federal University of Rio de Janeiro), and I've had the chance to see firsthand some interesting things related to power in the classroom, instructional design (or the lack of it) and groups, networks and communities (and some of the invisible barriers that might hinder their development). Lots of things to think about.

But this week I had the chance to come back again to the Elluminate sessions, this time with Nancy White as our weekly guest. It was a very interesting session, I took a few notes, and after organizing them a little bit, I decided that this was as good as any other excuse to write again about the course.

¡Leer más! »

Bridge geeks

I really hope I'll get soon the time to write in English, and not only to cross-post comments placed elsewhere. However, this is as much as I can allow myself right now, so please bear with me. :D Another cross-posting of a comment to a post by David Warlick, entitled "Ethan Zuckerman and the Internet is NOT flat":

Hi David,

I just saw this post. The ideas are very interesting for a third world blogger like me. Do you know if there are slides, podcasts or some record of Mr. Zucherman's presentation?

It caught my attention the idea of Brigde Bloggers. Last Monday I was talking with a group of colleagues including Nancy White and Leigh Blackall, about technology stewardship.

I proposed that, for Latin American countries, it makes sense to talk not only about tech stewards, but about tech bridge-builders, because of the huge language gap that we have. According to some official figures, less than 1% of Colombian population have basic communication skills in English. And, alas, most of the content on Internet is written in english.

That means that, for Latin America, the gap has to do not only with wires, but with language issues. In practice, the effect of this situation has two sides: One, most of our population are exposed only to the information translated by the media (obviously is barely a portion of what's going on). Second, we turn our attention to Spanish speaking countries that produce much more content (Spain, mainly).

This has a huge impact in areas like education, because most of the conversation happens in english, and we don't have enough edubloggers to keep up. Consequence? Ideas like, let's say, connectivism have taken almost two years to be translated. So, there is a real gap there. We are not participating in the conversation.

In the end, I agree with Zuckerman about the need to have more tech bridge-builders / Bridge bloggers (or Bridge Geeks?). If we want to keep up with what's going on, we really need them.



Is pedagogy getting in the way of learning?

This is a cross-posting of a comment made to this post by David Warlick:

Um, thinking about sincronicity and serendipity... :D

I woke up today (Sunday) and started to check my Google Reader on my cell phone, and then this post came up.

Just last night I was writing about one article from Thomas Frey called The future of Education, where he makes an interesting case on the barriers and obstacles that come from having a classroom & teacher focused educational system, along with some trends related to the education defined by its lack of limits that you mention, David.

I'm not completely comfortable with the idea of having "the platform". I feel, like Sharon says, that tailoring your own PLE makes more sense, and in the end will be much more flexible and meaningful that yet another centralized system (that kind of system is suggested by Frey sometimes, but I'm not really into that).

Then Vicki says something quite interesting: "How do you regulate them [the students] at home?" Curiously, this was one of the most interesting things in the Frey document. Why do we think that, as educators, is our mission to control and regulate? I think that for so many of us, there is right now a strong concern about keeping the "control" over our classroom/course (for example, look at the position of so many teachers about keeping cell phones out of the classroom). That has to do with an image of learning tied exclusively to the school and the classroom.

Like Frey says in his document, we need to understand that, in these days (and always, if it comes to that), the school is not the center of our students' life. It is just another place where THEIR learning happens, even if sometimes is completely unrelated to their lives.

So we are talking about a need of having control (generated not by the teacher, but by the whole system) and, when that is in the background, I think that even the most well-intended pedagogy can, eventually, get in the way of learning. And this is because the student is, in the end, trying to cope with the objectives defined by someone else.

Here's the link to my review of Frey's document. Sadly, it's in spanish by now.

Maybe I'm paranoid, but I think I'm coming to terms with something important, so the world is kind of sending me messages. :) Now I'm wondering if it makes sense to publish my review of Frey's document in english also...


Beta Learning…

I was reading today this post by Jay Cross, in which he says Auf Wiedersehen! to ADDIE. Then later, while I was eating, I remembered something Ulf-Daniel Ehlers said last week in our international seminar, about how Google (and most Web applications, both 1.0 and 2.0) are perpetual betas.

Now, this means clearly that there is not a "delivery version" of these applications. Instead, they are being upgraded and delivered in a continuous way. Um, I won't talk here about the impact this has (and will have) on the software development industry, because of the huge financial resources this kind of approach needs. Clearly, it is a different business model.

Anyway, what came to my mind was the idea that ADDIE is exactly a "version oriented" methodology. The basic diagram (in which are based several of the instructional design approaches) suggests that you analyze, design, develop, implement, evaluate and then go back to the drawing board.

But, as Jay suggests, what if we think of learning (and education and instructional design, now that we are at it) as "Perpetual beta" things? It makes sense to think in a flexible, informal, just in time way about learning, right?

That has a lot to do with some of the things Stephen said in his video (reviewed before) about keeping a registry of the learning we acquire/develop/build. Only when this kind of registry exists, we will be able to upgrade it and to discover the way our mind evolves as we learn...

So, from now on maybe it would make sense to introduce myself as "Diego Leal, Learner*". May God deliver us from becoming learners that end up with a "production version for release" (Uh, formal education degrees, anyone?) Now that would be a funny idea for a post...

*Beta!!