Category Archives: Web 2.0 Tools

EduCamp Colombia

This is the first post in a series of four, in which I will be reporting and commenting on the experience we had last year (December 2007) with a couple of EduCamps (that is, workshops on the use of social software tools) we offered, from the Ministry of Education, in Bogotá and Medellín. This task is long (I mean, really long) overdue, but I finally decided to undertake it. This first post includes information about the origins, motivations and decisions that guided the design of the workshop and a link to a page on my wiki, where you can find all the wiki">detailed design (in Spanish, so far).

The second and third posts will be devoted to show a little of what happened in Bogotá and Medellín, respectively. The last one will contain some lessons learned and a sort of "toolbox" and suggestions, if you want to embark on an adventure of this sort on your own.

It is worth saying that it may pass some time to get to complete the four posts. However, I promised Stephen a long time ago to write in English about this, so it's a commitment that I really want to honor.

With that said, let's get started!

The idea of the workshops came a Saturday afternoon in Bogota (August 2007), while talking to Nancy White, Jay Cross and Fernando, a day after we finished the International Seminar on E-Learning Quality we organized back then, in which we had them as guest speakers.

Nancy mentioned that, while taking notes during the event (Nancy is a person incredibly efficient to take notes!) and reporting online what was happening , Ulf (Ulf-Daniel Ehlers, another of the guest speakers) asked about some of the tools she was using. She explained to him, and then Ulf did the same with Virginie (another guest speaker), who was sitting next to him.

This little situation was quite appealing to Nancy so, later, we ended up discussing how to organize an experience meant to foster "over-the-shoulder" learning. The ideas discussed were meant to turn into something "concrete" that what we often do with our colleagues (and even perfect strangers), when we read the newspaper of someone sitting next to us, or when we ask for help to someone sitting in the next chair in our office. In fact, this is a very common practice among programmers, for example, who share tips and solutions while working on the same computer room...

We saw that, if we wanted such an experiment to be successful, we would need each participant to have his own computer and, taking into account the intense use that both Nancy and Jay make of online tools, we would need a good Internet connection.

Back then, through my feeds I had already heard about Pecha Kucha and some of the BarCamps and PodCamps made in the United States and Europe, and about the experimental traveling unconference made in New Zealand in early 2007. I discussed about it with Jay and Nancy, and I started to see the huge importance of designing an event in which, to reproduce what I heard from Nancy and Stephen repeatedly, we could model practices of collaboration between perfect strangers, in an environment that would allow them to discover that we all can be teachers and learners at the same time.

To keep this short, in the following months I got more info about some of the various alternatives available in the unconference world (including, let's say, the OpenSpace technology and the World Café), and I started to design the overall narrative for the event.

The design document, which served as a guide to the activities of the workshop, can be found in my wiki (in Spanish only). From a static document (as released in December 2007), my wish is that it becomes a support to organizers and facilitators of this type of activity, so that's why it is a wiki right now.

As in so many other things, I have to say that the confidence that Claudia Zea and Maria Victoria Angulo gave me to launch these workshops was priceless, as well as the support of my team at the Ministry of Education (Gloria James, Karen Caceres and Francisco Suarez). The support offered by CINTEL to put in place all the logistics is equally priceless. And last but not least, the decision of Stephen Downes to join us in this new adventure was invaluable. Now, I would not say it was unexpected, because Stephen is someone with a very open mind to undertake this kind of thing, but I think it was very fortunate, because the date of the workshops matched a small space in his agenda, which allowed him to join us in Bogotá and Medellín.

Now, one may wonder why Stephen Downes and not any other speaker. The workshop is built on a background related not only to collaborative learning, but relies on concepts such as connectivism, personal learning environments and, ultimately, has to do with the possibility that each learner should have of discovering his interests (and eventually explore them with the support of technology), beyond a curriculum or some pre-defined learning goals.

During my time at the Ministry and through the inmersion I had in the blogosphere, I discovered that Downes is one of those people who not only preaches about technology, nor talks about its potential, but he takes time not only to use it, but to share, create and experiment with it. But it was not only a matter of technology. Stephen is also at the center of discussions about connectivism, e-learning and personal learning environments. That, added to the previous visits he did to Colombia, and his knowledge about the things we wanted to do, made him the best person to deliver a lecture to give some context about what we wanted to do in the workshop.

Both Nancy and Stephen, as well as Fernando and some other people, were key in debugging the initial design ideas and building the workshop narrative. To all of them my gratitude for the time they devoted to this.

So, to make a long story short, I'd like to invite you to review the wiki (that is, if you can read Spanish… I'll have to do something about that), to express your comments (good or bad) about the design (if there are any readers here who made part of it), and to join me in the report of what happened in Bogotá and Medellín.

Technorati:

Tools for synchronous meetings…

This is a message I sent in last October to some colleagues, with whom I was trying to find out a suitable solution (that is, feasible in our Colombian context), for some synchronous meetings we were having.

A few days ago, I had the chance to talk with Alvaro Quiroga about Ustream and, after reading an e-mail from him today, I decided that it makes sense to go public about this message. Anyway, my knowledge about theses tools has improved in these months, but I still think that the analysis makes sense.

So, here it goes:

----------------

General Thoughts

  • Bandwidth will always be a problem for a group of participants [in Colombia]. We have to live with that.
  • Because of bandwidth, there is no tool able to accomplish everything we need. If we have low bandwidth, there will be either loss of information (worst case scenario) or low quality (best case scenario).
  • From my own experience: Even if all the previous testing goes well, there are about 90% of chance that things will go astray when we go live. [Oh, gee... :D]
  • Screen recording (if done) must be done by someone with VERY good bandwidth (I would say someone in the US [This made sense because of the people involved in the activity, back then]).
  • For the translated chat [we were doing real time translation for non-spanish speakers], it would make sense to use the Moodle chat [we were using Moodle for asynchronous discussions]. That way, we could get the people to get into Moodle and the chat would be recorded automatically.
  • Must check if people connecting from MoE [that is, Ministry of Education]have access to technology. A lot of firewall restrictions.. [this was our situation, but it probably happens everywhere]
  • A decision must be made about how complex do we want the tool. Best case scenario is Elluminate [Or Wimba, or Adobe Connect, as I know now], with everything in one place. If we don't get that, what is acceptable? Only Audio (skypecast, phone bridge)? Audio/Video? Text chat??? I would go with best case scenario (all-in-one tool), and my second option would be audioconferencing. [Now, it's clear that this kind of decision must be made for ANY tech steward, right?]

[So I proposed a few plans, with the knowledge I had back then]

Plan A: Elluminate. [This probably applies to Wimba and Adobe Connect as well]
Pro:

  • Best option in terms of set-up and scalability.
  • Recording is easy
  • Integrated chat/presentation
  • Moderation (Makes it easy to mute participants' microphones).
  • Similar to WizIQ, so maybe the learning curve won't be that horrible.

Con:

  • Requires Java [We don't have Java installed everywhere. In fact, all around the country we have machines that won't run Java, because of their memory or processor. This applies also to Wimba, I'm not sure about Adobe Connect]
  • Low Bandwidth behavior: Transmission stops, until buffer is filled again. [I'm still not sure about this. Later tests showed a very good behavior when faced with network congestions. The voice, for example, is played faster until the client gets synchronized with the server.]

Plan B: Skype (The U3S choice: Ustream, Skypecast, Skypechat, Slideshare... LOL)
Pro:

  • Tried before with at least 15 people (at MoE).
  • Does a better job adapting to different bandwidhts
  • Moderation [Obviously, you can do that with Elluminate]

Con:

  • No chat (could use skypechat, it's not that difficult)
  • No presentation (could use slideshare, and voice-synch like Nancy did)
  • No video (could use Ustream, and get the recording online at once)
  • Low bandwidth behavior: Transmission degrades, information is lost.
  • Recording is not easy, unless you arrange all the screens in the desktop and use Camtasia.

Action:

  • Should we try this set-up? Skypecast/Skypechat/Slideshare?
  • Mental note: We could invite participants to help with these tests. Let them see that technology is not to be underestimated when planning CoPs, and it takes a lot of time... [This is not a good strategy by default. Most people are not really interested in fighting with technology. They just want to use it quickly, and they want it to be reliable]

Plan C: Moodle Plugin (Asterisk is a company that have free voIP products. Some of them are Moodle-integrated).
Pro:

  • Everything in one place!! [Remember, we were using Moodle. Then again, both Wimba and Elluminate have now Moodle integration]
  • Can use the Moodle chat right away...
  • People could leave voice-messages to each other from inside Moodle. [This works only with Asterisk. I'm not sure if Wimba offers this (Voice Tools, maybe?)]

Con:

  • Need a lot of testing (haven't tried it before), so there could be ANY problem.
  • If part of the intention is to expose people to technology, this would leave them tied to Moodle. Is that ok? [Better, would that make sense??]

-----------------

That was it. After October, I remember I saw somewhere (courosa, maybe?) the same U3S setup described, so I guess it wasn't such a crazy idea after all.

Now I'm thinking about what other things I should try and make public, even after some time. The first in my list, clearly, are my reflections on EduCamp Colombia...


Downes on Learning and Web 2.0

I just found, via David Wilcox, a video presentation made by Stephen, in which he talks about how Web2.0 opportunities can help to develop your own learning process.

Three important things (among all the other interesting things said):

  1. You are at the center of your own personal learning network: Sounds obvious, but it has strong implications in our minds. When I htink about learning, I'm supposed to think about MY needs, MY interests, and not those suggested/imposed externally (curricula, undesirable work, etc.). This has all to do with studying, working and doing what is really important for me. It becomes a very transcendental issue, because in order to exploit my full potential as a learner, I have to be doing what makes sense to me. In the end, it's not about my teachers, my employers or even my family or friends. It's about ME. Very humanistic lesson... :D
  2. To gain from self-directed learning you must be self-directed: This is in line with the previous point. If someone/something else than myself is proposing my interests, I won't be able to exploit my own full potential as learner. Then again, it is REALLY complicated for many of us to behave in a self-directed way. And this kind of behavior has to do not only with learning, but with our role as citizens and part of a community. A self-directed individual will have a stronger voice and a stronger critical sense. Sadly, many of our formal education settings are structured to diminish that self-directed behavior.
  3. These principles should guide how we teach as well as how we learn: I keep thinking about how often we, as teachers, refer to our students as if they were "study subjects". "The students these days are like this", "The students these days are like that". And we identify a lot of characteristics of these students, but we forget to see that we are supposed to have those characteristics in order to be functional learners in this world. Only when we, as teachers, start to behave like real long life learners, it will be clear what are we supposed to do as teachers, in order to foster and cultivate our students' abilities.

Here´s the video:

Now I'm kind of curious about how Stephen made appear that video window... It's clear that it is on a Powerpoint presentation but, was that in real time, or edited? Hmmmm... :-/